Chat! culturecrossfire.slack.com

Ruthless Aggression era WWE or Early TNA Wrestling?

Which is better?

  • Ruthless Aggression era WWE

    Votes: 10 52.6%

  • Early TNA

    Votes: 9 47.4%
  • Total voters
    19
Baby Shoes

Baby Shoes

Baby Shoes
Messages
25,397
Reaction score
2,222
Points
293
I have greater questions about you checking out Toby Keith’s Twitter, bro
 
Baby Shoes

Baby Shoes

Baby Shoes
Messages
25,397
Reaction score
2,222
Points
293
Just like the Hangman I am more of a Dixie Chicks kinda bro
 
Lazgistics Supervisor

Lazgistics Supervisor

Making dumb observations since 2002
Messages
19,921
Reaction score
2,628
Points
253
Location
Music City
I feel that if we're saying TNA and Impact are the same despite different management entirely, then we're also going to have to say WCW/JCP are the same.

Which means no, TNA/Impact has not been around longer than WCW/JCP.
 
Valeyard

Valeyard

Retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Messages
14,436
Reaction score
6,832
Points
253
That's fair. I was going by Turner years and beyond and the fact that it's tied much closer to its past than WCW was to JCP, or so it feels.

Speaking personally it's close enough to at least always be TNA if only because typing Impact all the time just sucks. Wrestling's all about acronyms idgaf.
 
Lazgistics Supervisor

Lazgistics Supervisor

Making dumb observations since 2002
Messages
19,921
Reaction score
2,628
Points
253
Location
Music City
You're right about the closeness in time and acronyms, that's for damn sure. That's another fun parallel between Impact and WCW: they were both named after the major show of their predecessors from before purchase.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top