Chat! culturecrossfire.slack.com

AT&T to institute caps on internet use beginning May 2nd

NoCalMike

Welcome to Prime Time, bitch!
Messages
7,851
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
Sacramento, CA
I am an AT&T user. I don't believe I come anywhere near 150 GB per month, but I still do not like this trend. I know AT&T isn't the only ISP. The companies claim it is because 2% use a disproportionate amount of bandwidth, but I hardly see how that is a relevant argument because everyone was sold a flat fee package in the first place, and secondly, it's not like the 98% who only use 2-5 GB per month are seeing any type of decrease on their bill.

To me, the real culprit behind the caps is to drive people's bills up. As services like Netflix, Amazon on demand and other various video streaming services come down the pike in the future, it is making people second guess these expensive cable/satellite packages they are paying for, especially the crazy prices of premium networks. You have companies like Comcast and AT&T who along with internet, are always sending you ads NON STOP about also bundling their TV services along with the internet. They are trying to offer the same product for a much higher price.

Instead of going out and competing with the content and price point of services such as netflix instant streaming, they are trying to find ways that will jack up your internet bill, just in case you decide to drop their TV service. That way an internet bill that used to cost $50, will now cost $100 or more, so they are not losing money per customer when they cancel tv subscriptions.

Also, the 150 GB limit sounds ok right now for most people, however streaming content delivered in 1080p content on a regular basis is right around the corner. It is going to happen soon, which with it will bring along much bigger files that are coming "down the pipes" 150 GB won't seem like such a huge number in five years I bet. Finally, there is also no guarantee that the 150 GB is going to stick. Lets say in 6 months, your average user is still only using 5-10 GB per month. These ISP's can then decide, "Wow, you know what, 150GB was way to generous, the new cap is 100GB or 80GB" and so on.....

Thoughts?
 

Kageho

@DSookochoff
Messages
8,472
Reaction score
50
Points
0
Welcome to what the CRTC is trying to make totally legitmate in Canada.

It sucks, its stupid and unfortunately, will likely happen because we're fucking morons who won't put up a fight about it.
 

Youth N Asia

Boners, and farts.
Messages
11,762
Reaction score
610
Points
253
Location
Michigan
I go through AT&T. I probably won't use enough to even notice the difference. If that day ever comes I'll likely threaten to switch to Charter.
 

SFH

Integral Poster
Messages
7,071
Reaction score
1,177
Points
218
Location
over there
Fine I'll just do all my major downloading while at work and transfer it to a flash drive.

Problem solved, for now.
 

Vitamin X

Integral Poster
Messages
8,487
Reaction score
1
Points
153
Location
Portland, Oregon
The fact these companies have basically an oligopoly with broadband internet and they're SUPPOSED to be regulated by the FCC is what makes these things even more sickening. iPhone users are probably already quite familiar with the same bullshit on AT&T's cell network, and now Verizon's following suit as well.

I haven't been "throttled" by Comcast despite using a ton of bandwidth, but I use a lot on Sprint and am super glad that not only do they have the best value for plans but when they say unlimited it actually means unlimited. Wish I could find a home ISP that did the same as well..
 

NoCalMike

Welcome to Prime Time, bitch!
Messages
7,851
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
Sacramento, CA
Yeah I have Sprint for my cell carrier as well. So far so good.

AT&T was asked the question if the 150 GB limit is "locked in" as the number, and they wouldn't comment. This is what scares me the most, as it probably means they will try to justify lowering the limit in the future.

It really just feels like the companies are realizing the the future is in digital media for all our needs, and they are trying to stay two steps ahead of the game by locking in the infrastructure to gouge the customer now, and the way they are trying to keep things quiet is by giving us a big threshold by 2011 standards so no one will complain while they lobby the government, but by the time people wake up and realize this is some bullshit, it will be too late, and 200 GB per month of bandwidth will easily be the norm.

And of course the FCC always caves to money interests. It is rather pathetic. The "free market" crowd will always side with the companies quest to make a bigger profit, and then there is always enough (D)'s to go along and be bought in order to tip the scales.

I also agree about the oligarchy. In my city, if you want DSL - AT&T, if you want Cable - Comcast.....besides those two companies, I think there is Surewest, but not sure. So at the most there is only 3 companies that offer broadband service. Pathetic. The monopolies will be a big problem going forward.
 

Kahran Ramsus

Integral Poster
Messages
10,817
Reaction score
54
Points
188
Instead of going out and competing with the content and price point of services such as netflix instant streaming, they are trying to find ways that will jack up your internet bill, just in case you decide to drop their TV service. That way an internet bill that used to cost $50, will not cost $100 or more, so they are not losing money per customer when they cancel tv subscriptions.

This is exactly why it is being done.
 

Ripper

I'll make your ass sense.
Messages
1,062
Reaction score
14
Points
88
Location
Atlanta, GA
150 really isn't that much anymore if you are using netflix and such. The streaming of HD movies have made most of these caps kind of ridiculously low.

I have CLEAR which doesn't have a limit but throttles speeds at certain hours of the day... which sucks ass by the way, but what can you do.
 
Top