The issue isn’t that there is a right or wrong regarding “rooting” for a tv show/movie or whatever the case may be (I’m guilty of this). My problem is the comment from Mole stipulating that a victory at this award show would be "fuckin awesome".
I wouldn’t necessarily have a issue with that type of rooting interest, even if it’s for a show that has seen a sharp decline over the years, but the impression that I gathered from Mole is that it wouldn’t be awesome because it rewards the show with appreciation from this specific panel of judges or improves the quality of the show, but rather that it would validate his fandom for the show. Which is essentially the point made by USC 55. Give support because you feel the show/performer is justified to be considered the best of that particular field but not because it makes watching the show worthwhile.
A true quality show doesn’t need to be pampered with awards to showcase it’s value. A critically acclaimed show such as The Wire or The Shield would always hold up. If anything, the constant fury that exists because of the “snub” treatment towards these shows and those of its ilk will expand the discussion of their excellence well beyond their respective runs. Meanwhile, heavily rewarded shows such as Frasier or The West Wing are largely forgotten by this point in history aside from being trivia answers. If HIMYM wins for Best Comedy, congrats to those involved, if it doesn’t, I’m fairly sure the fans will still follow the show as fervently as ever.