- Messages
- 22,758
- Reaction score
- 2,167
- Points
- 313
I really liked Train to Busan so I'll be curious to read your thoughts on the sequel and whether it's worth seeking out for a watch.
They should've picked a lane and made it purely either a Dark Comedy about the Mortgage Crisis or a Horror/Thriller about the Mortgage Crisis. Doing all of those genres is weird as Rosemarie DeWitt isn't good at the comedy parts and Danny McBride isn't that good at the Horror/Thriller parts. They either should've just had this as a dark comedy with Sweet Dee playing DeWitt's part while McBride stays the lead or a thriller/horror with DeWitt staying the lead and say Michael Shannon playing McBride's part and a different cast than one with primarily comedic actors and actresses.. Trying to do both hurt the movie as the tone was all over the place and made it hard to get invested. I enjoyed seeing Kaitlin Olson and Danny McBride scream at each other for a few minutes as well as David Allen Grier, but there isn't much here.
Arizona (2018), directed by Jonathan Watson
Reason for Watching: Banging through 2018 movies. I try not to watch foreign language movies twice, and I have a few English language movies left from that year.
This is one of those movies that's like a cause of me wanting to write shorter reviews. If you want to watch Danny McBride rampage through an uninhabited, 2009 real estate crashed neighborhood, this might be the movie for you. It says on IMDB that this is a comedy-thriller. I think they may have forgotten a lot of the comedy. The short of it is, Cassie (Rosemarie DeWitt) is a realtor in this already mentioned neighborhood, which is in Arizona. She lives there with her daughter, and sells houses for an unscrupulous character played by Seth Rogen. One day, Danny McBride's character walks into the real estate office, and triggered by the lack of rising value in his house, he goes and kills Seth Rogen. Then he captures Cassie, and this turns into a movie where his character keeps Cassie alive while failing to kill her. Story that we've seen before, and all of that.
Arizona doesn't have any of the cool stuff that the last movie had, and as a result there's way less to talk about. What Arizona does have is Sweet Dee. She's only barely in the movie, but she says enough. The premise is ridiculous, and unfortunately there isn't enough humor in the story to really keep it going. I was interested in how things would work out for Cassie and her daughter because a lot of the tropes you usually see in this movie failed. One of the people called was immediately shot in the head. The other blew up.
Fortunately, what this movie is, is it's really short. The concept doesn't overstay its welcome, but someone as talented comedically as Danny McBride is should have more opportunity to show that. Any moral lesson this movie may have tried to tell about the housing crisis completely failed, and at least at the beginning of the movie, it seemed like it was going to tell some kind of story related to that.
4.5/10
They should've picked a lane and made it purely either a Dark Comedy about the Mortgage Crisis or a Horror/Thriller about the Mortgage Crisis. Doing all of those genres is weird as Rosemarie DeWitt isn't good at the comedy parts and Danny McBride isn't that good at the Horror/Thriller parts. They either should've just had this as a dark comedy with Sweet Dee playing DeWitt's part while McBride stays the lead or a thriller/horror with DeWitt staying the lead and say Michael Shannon playing McBride's part and a different cast than one with primarily comedic actors and actresses.. Trying to do both hurt the movie as the tone was all over the place and made it hard to get invested. I enjoyed seeing Kaitlin Olson and Danny McBride scream at each other for a few minutes as well as David Allen Grier, but there isn't much here.
Yeah for sure. I've only seen Rosemarie DeWitt in soul crushingly depressing movies like Rachel Getting Married so she was very out of place in a comedy.It should have been more of a comedy, I think
So is Jimmy Fallon to be fair.Even in a 3-4 minute puff late night talk show interview, you could tell she was comedy averse.
Wild Rose (2019), directed by Tom Harper
Reason for Watching: Even though I'm sure this isn't pertinent to the movie, earlier today I was thinking about how my grandfather actually tried to become a country musician. This movie was also nominated for a BAFTA.
I bet that very few people here have seen Wild Rose. It's pretty much as I just described in the paragraph above, with some notable differences. Rose-Lynn (Jessie Buckley) is from Glasgow and wants to be a country singer, but she did a year long bid in prison for throwing heroin over the wall. As a result she lost her job singing country music. She wants to get back what she's lost and then some. I can't feign my surprise when I saw that Glasgow has their own Grand Ole Opry, and it's real! Besides that, the film follows a lot of musical drama tropes. Rose-Lynn has a mother who holds her back and wants her to have a serious life, until she feels bad about her daughter having a serious life and sets her loose. Also, Rose-Lynn has kids that she left behind while in prison.
First of all, we gotta address the premise a little more. There's country music in Scotland! They even have their own club! Ultimately, given the material and how many of these sorts of movies there are, the film entirely relies on the performance of the lead actress. Said performance is really good. Jessie Buckley is a very good actress though. If you've watched Chernobyl, you've seen that. She is very convincing here and she's also a pretty good singer. I've complained before about these kinds of movies having someone else do the songs instead of the actor/actress. In this case, I have no complaints about that, and because I don't have those complaints, this film will be getting a little boost with my score.
Even though I already said that Wild Rose follows familiar patterns, there are a few unusual tweaks that come at exactly the right moment. Rose-Lynn deciding to leave Nashville was one of those moments. At the same time I feel like this is a case where performance > film. There's an authenticity that the character has as a result of being able to sing, feeling like a working class Scot that isn't pretending, and that's crucial to this sort of story. The country aspect is also the right amount of off-kilter and throws the viewer for a loop. Also, while looking at this list, man there were a lot of good movies last year and I haven't even watched all of them.
7.5/10
Yeah Stewart's been in some stinkers since 2016. On second viewing, I liked that movie Underwater that came out last year, but she needs to go back to working with Oliver Assayas (Personal Shopper and Clouds Of Sils Maria) and Kelly Reichardt and other indie auteurs of that type. Assayas especially knows how to play to her strengths. She seems so much more comfortable in the indie films compared to more mainstream films.
Seberg (2019), directed by Benedict Andrews
Reason for Watching: I need to start watching these again, so I picked something short and recent, with the feeling that it might be enough of a period piece.
The overarching feeling I have after watching Seberg is that I hate when movies double deal the way this one does. Let me explain a little bit. Seberg is the story of Jean Seberg (Kristen Stewart), whose life and career was entirely ruined by COINTELPRO. COINTELPRO, as some of you already know, was a J. Edgar Hoover initiative to take down and disrupt those who Hoover felt to be undesirable to the path he wanted this nation to go down. That's an oversimplification, but I don't want to spend all night going through this. As Seberg tells it, Seberg is trailed by Jack Solomon (Jack O'Connell) and Carl Kowalski (Vince Vaughn), the former being new to this kind of work and the latter being a piece of shit. So, you can probably figure out what I mean by double dealing. The younger guy is the typical scummy FBI agent with a conscience, who feels bad about doing something that is a horrible violation, but he keeps doing it until he no longer can. Making matters easier for these agents is that Seberg had an affair with Hakim Jamal (Anthony Mackie). You really should already know who some of these people are.
In large part because of this dynamic between the agents, and in trying to humanize one of them despite the fact they were doing horrendous things, I really did not like this film. The screenplay just isn't what a film like this one really needs to be. Also, because of that focus on the agents, the story shifts away from Stewart's performance in a manner where the agents receive far too much time on screen. In the process of that, there seems to be no importance placed on why Seberg's actions necessitated this response from the FBI. We're given a very short video where black guys = bad and that's about it for their explanation. I just can't reiterate enough how much this kind of thing bothers me, but the FBI agent with a conscience is such a terrible cliche that is never good.
Whenever Stewart is on screen, the film is better, but this just ain't it. The story about Jamal being the father of her child is so heinous, it's BEYOND BELIEF how anyone could possibly make the decision to humanize one of these agents. What the hell were these people thinking when they wrote this? Vaughn's character is also a cliche of an evil FBI agent, but the thing is, the people who did things like COINTELPRO, they really were cliches of evil agents if not even worse than that. People who worked on these kinds of projects were complete scum who know what they were doing was wrong and justified it to themselves with some false sense of duty. There really isn't a way this could have been a good film, because Seberg's story is just one part of a larger puzzle that featured more key players. All of which remains unseen in the film.
Also, man. Kristen Stewart hasn't had a good run since Personal Shopper. These are some bad scripts.
3.5/10
2019 Films Ranked