KOAB
KOAB
Mike Knox
KOAB said:Mike Knox
BurningPirateShipSex said:Knox's beard alone should be enough to overcome Cena.
Silence said:BurningPirateShipSex said:Knox's beard alone should be enough to overcome Cena.
Can it help him get out of Cena's "deadly" STF?
MFer said:Checked out most of the replay late last night online:
MITB-Very good, would've preferred to see Christian win but oh well.
The Metal Maniac said:I could not believe that HBK kicked out of the Tombstone. Seriously, has anyone ever kicked out of the cross-armed pin following a tombstone? I know HHH got his foot on the ropes not too long ago, but I don't recall ever seeing anyone getting their shoulder up.
Card subject to change -> no false advertising
Card subject to change is there so if somebody gets injured and can't compete, or if someone has a family emergency and has to leave, or if someone has transportation issues and can't get to the show, they have an out. It is designed for things out of the control of the promoter. It is not an excuse to take one of the most heavily advertised matches on the card and make it a dark match at the last minute with no warning. Intentionally making it a dark match is false advertising, because it was not due to something out of control of the promoter.
And before someone plays the "They announced it on wwe.com before the show" card, not everybody has internet access. Not everybody who has internet access was able to access wwe.com in the final three hours before showtime. And to further slap the fans who bought the show before the announcement was made, they couldn't even bother to so much as mention the match during the show. Had the show opened with JR saying "Because we want to make sure the main events have enough time to make the show, we had our Tag Team Title Unification Match before we went on the air. If we have enough time to show it tonight, we will, but if we don't, we'll show highlights on Raw tomorrow night and it will be available in its entirety on the DVD release," it still would have sucked, but at least they'd have acknowledged the fact that it couldn't air for some reason.
Instead, having not been on wwe.com all day so I could take my two year old daughter to the park, I watched a four hour PPV and didn't see one of the matches I was most looking forward to.
I don't even want the full $54.95 refund. I'll accept a free copy of the DVD when it comes out.
And before you think I'm an overreacting fanboy, let me tell you about the last seven shows I paid for.
1. July 25, 2008 house show, Youngstown, OH. Shawn Michaels was scheduled to be in one of the only two matches advertised ahead of time. Unable to compete due to the eye injury suffered at The Great American Bash. Fair enough reason, except they never bothered to tell the live crowd he wasn't there at the start of the show.
2. Unforgiven PPV in Cleveland. I'm always up for attending a nearby PPV. I spent $65 per person to see two blatant bits of false advertising. The first one, the fact that Michaels vs. Chris Jericho ended without a pin or submission despite the fact that the only way the could end was by pinfall or submission. Second, CM Punk gets attacked backstage, and somehow Jericho, the same man who was so unable to continue that they changed the stipulation of his earlier match, ends up being the replacement and winning the World Heavyweight Title. Two cases of intentional false advertising in a three hour PPV.
3. Survivor Series 2008. Jeff Hardy attacked in his hotel, Edge returns and wins title. Once again, "storyline" taking away a match I paid to see.
4. Royal Rumble 2009. No false advertising even though Matt turning on Jeff sucked.
5. Raw in Cleveland, 1/26/2009. No false advertising on the card itself, but one result made meaningless over the next three weeks. Kofi Kingston beats Kane to qualify for the Elimination Chamber. But a) Kane made the match anyway and b) Kingston didn't. Which leads me to...
6. No Way Out. Edge attacks Kingston, takes his spot in the Elimination Chamber, wins the World Heavyweight Title.
7. And now last night. I bought the card before the announcement the match wouldn't air. For me to order a PPV, there have to be three matches I want to see. Those three were Taker-Michaels, which delivered, Money in the Bank, which delivered, and the tag team title unification match, which didn't air and, as I understand it from someone who was there, was one of the best matches of the night.
So yes, considering five of the last seven shows I've paid to see, either in person or on PPV, have fallen to the dreaded "card subject to change" clause, I feel I'm entitled to something for my trouble.
The first one, the fact that Michaels vs. Chris Jericho ended without a pin or submission despite the fact that the only way the could end was by pinfall or submission.
DrVenkman PhD said:Precious Roy said:DrVenkman PhD said:MMA Fans: Explain the jab Meltzer took at Affliction by comparing the Kid Rock performance to Affliction: Banned. Thanks!
Megadeth played and the crowd shit on it
Did they not play their rendition of the Duke Nukem theme? I would have been pretty mad if they didn't and pretty happy if they did.
Reviews to Meltz have been mixed at best, but "In the Middle" seems to come up an awful lot, though one guy really seemed to "get it" with his Mania 21 comparison. Mania 21 is a great MITB match and a great Shawn Michaels match with a time wasting Piper's Pit, two weak world title matches on a top, and a sumo wrestling match. But that good is so good that I think that's a pretty great Mania.
JHawk said:And before you think I'm an overreacting fanboy
zio said:JHawk said:And before you think I'm an overreacting fanboy
Seriously? Look at your response.
So, theoretically, would excessive bleeding, but Bob Backlund lost about 100 title matches that way without dropping the belt, so...Papacita said:The first one, the fact that Michaels vs. Chris Jericho ended without a pin or submission despite the fact that the only way the could end was by pinfall or submission.
In kayfabe terms, wouldn't a stoppage techically count as a submission?
zio said:DrVenkman PhD said:Precious Roy said:DrVenkman PhD said:MMA Fans: Explain the jab Meltzer took at Affliction by comparing the Kid Rock performance to Affliction: Banned. Thanks!
Megadeth played and the crowd shit on it
Did they not play their rendition of the Duke Nukem theme? I would have been pretty mad if they didn't and pretty happy if they did.
Reviews to Meltz have been mixed at best, but "In the Middle" seems to come up an awful lot, though one guy really seemed to "get it" with his Mania 21 comparison. Mania 21 is a great MITB match and a great Shawn Michaels match with a time wasting Piper's Pit, two weak world title matches on a top, and a sumo wrestling match. But that good is so good that I think that's a pretty great Mania.
Bite your tongue. Batista/HHH from WM 21 was damn good. The buildup to it had an almost old school feel to it, as well. HHH "gigging" was also a highlight. THAT WAS A GREAT MATCH YOU MONSTER