GDI. Discourse about Meltzer giving Cody/Reigns "only" ***1/2 sent me down
another rabbit hole (Damn you
@Epic Springs ).
First off, it'll never fail to baffle me that Meltzer gave the worst, major Bret/Owen match *****. I can't think of any reason why that SummerSlam '94 cage match is a perfect match. He must have been bullied by the '94 WON readers for not giving Bret/Owen at WrestleMania X the full five and did it for the rematch to appease them. Now that cage match...that's a ***1/2 match (OK, maybe closer to **** but nowhere near five!)
Second and most glaringly, until the mid 2010s, he could go years without rating a match five stars and suddenly, there's like ten matches a year that he gives the full monty too? Maybe it is him getting soft in old age. Look I'm not one of those cynical bastards who hate the current product. And athletically/gymnastically speaking (which I think is a lot of what Meltzer likes), I can agree with the idea that pro wrestling in the past 5-10 years is better than it's ever been. HOWEVER, it's not 10x better than it's ever been.
I honestly think Uncle Dave is trolling us a bit and is overrating (or underrating maybe in the case of Cody/Reigns) matches to boost the algorithm and get dorks like me and Epic chattering!