Conspiracy_Victim said:
That professor from American University, Lichtman I think, that predicts the presidential race and has picked every winner for like the last 30 years called this a month or 2 ago. I laughed when I heard about it.
That's really all I can think of with this. Bizarre.
Yeah, I posted about that at the time. He had like 5 or 6 questions or something that hr uses for his algorithm that pointes to Trump. Nobody listened, perhaps because we want to think the we are independent and unpredictable but maybe when it comes down to it the human race at large is just a computer program with behaviour easy to predict based off of trends.
The kkk can fuck off, Trump denounced them and they had nothing to do with getting him elected of course they'd try to claim credit.
Don't forget that the same media which had led some of you to believe that Trump never had a chance from the primaries all the way through are the same media which paints Trump to be a monster. Everything he had said has been taken wildly out of context and used to make him look much much worse than he is.
Example
"We need to put a ban on muslims coming into this country until we can figure out whats going on"
This could be interprited in two ways. 1. The way I would like to interprit it. "Hey attacks are going on around he globe and have been corrolated to the syrian refugees. Let's figure out a better vetting process before we start accepting them into the country en mass." And 2. The way it's been interprited in the media "im hitler I hate muslims they arent welcome in my america"
I hope and feel that I am right about this and that he will be no worse than any other republican president, which is still bad when it comes to social issues.
I say we split North America down the middle and have one side be a haven for liberals and one side be a haven for conservatives then our government could always be closer in line with our beliefs.
