Precious Roy
hashtag trashbag
- Messages
- 19,704
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 176
Who is Shaun King? Isn't that a former NFL QB? Seahawks?
I'm sure there's some hyperbole in there, but at least half of what he's shared has been accompanied by police reports, video, or confirming statements from people like school administrators.#sorrynotsorry said:I wonder how much of it is true
Amy pats fan said:was joking, but legit didn't know this Shaun King. That twitter feed is seriously disturbing. Muslim women having their hijabs pulled off??! Random people being yelled at and assaulted simply because they aren't white?!!
Harley Quinn said:Got this tweet back re: the USPS incident in Cambridge, MA so at least that's something. Assholes like that should be fired when doing that type of stuff on the job.
" USPS Help @USPSHelp 58m58 minutes ago
@DH523 Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The issue has been escalated to the appropriate members of USPS management. ^KKG"
CookieMueller said:The Muslim ban information is back on his website, btw.
Also, man is he looking like a Washington outsider with these cabinet picks. JP Morgan CEO for treasury secretary. TAKE THAT FAT CATS! #draintheswamp
snuffbox said:Weren't you all for Clinton a short while ago, still fly?
Regardless of Hillary Clinton’s concession, a close analysis must be done of the actual voting results (machine tabulations and paper ballots cast) versus the vote reporting (to the board of elections and Secretary of State offices). Some important facts collectively warrant this:
1) Russians have heavily influenced this election for the past six months and have successfully hacked into the election systems of more than half the states in the country;
2) Major public polls and the Clinton campaign's internal polls were historically off the mark, and in the campaign's case, didn't match the voter file records, which is unheard of to this level. This is especially odd considering that Clinton's campaign manager Robby Mook is one the most brilliant in politics when it comes to micro-targeting and voter analysis. Even GOP strategist and pollster Frank Luntz called the 2016 exit polls “the worst and least accurate we’ve ever seen,” in a Tweet sent on election night.
3) Homeland Security/DOJ teamed up with a group that is part of Anonymous based in Washington, D.C. called “The Protectors.” This group saw a lot of activity during Election Day from the Russians and believe that the voting results projected don’t match the internal and public polls because the voting results were manufactured in favor of Trump in heavily Republican counties in key states, and voting results may have been decreased for Clinton in key Democratic counties via malware that was placed by the Russians when they hacked the election systems of more than half our states.
4) Trump/Manafort set-up the “rigged election” narrative months ago preparing for exactly this scenario. This is straight out of Manafort’s playbook, and Putin’s, too — accuse the other side of doing what you’re doing so that you cannot be accused of doing it. There is no short supply of examples of this: Putin regularly accuses the US of meddling in Russia’s affairs when he annexed Crimea, invaded east Ukraine, and holds sham elections in Russia.
5) Kellyanne Conway, an expert conservative pollster, was selected as Trump’s campaign manager when Paul Manafort took too much heat about his Russian’s connections and “resigned” (though he has likely continued to be involved behind the scenes and continues to have a residence in Trump Towers), and Conway helped lead messaging that polls were all wrong and that Trump has “shadow supporters,” a term that mainstream journalists echoed as the election results began to favor Trump.
6) Paul Manafort, who has heavy ties to the Kremlin, is being federally investigated for his work in Ukraine, was virtually silent since resigning from Trump’s campaign a few months ago, but sent his first tweet since resigning last week saying that by the Sunday before the election Trump would have the 270 votes needed to win (despite internal and public polls saying otherwise).
Something seems very off and needs to be closely examined. Homeland Security/DOJ should be able to verify this, even though Clinton conceded.
During the campaign, coverage of the issues was blotted out by coverage of Hillary Clinton’s emails and Donald Trump’s broad suite of sociopathic tendencies. And of the issues that did receive any attention, a conspicuously missing one was Paul Ryan’s plan to push Medicare beneficiaries into private health insurance. Reporters just assumed that, since Trump never talked about it, it won’t happen. But Paul Ryan still wants it to happen. And in a Fox News interview with Bret Baier, Ryan said Medicare privatization is on.
“Your solution has always been to put things together, including entitlement reform,” says Baier, using Republican code for privatizing Medicare. Ryan replies, “If you’re going to repeal and replace Obamacare, you have to address those issues as well. … Medicare has got some serious issues because of Obamacare. So those things are part of our plan to replace Obamacare.”
BigD said:http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/2/donald-trump-holds-high-flag-gay-equality/
Harley Quinn said:BigD said:http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/2/donald-trump-holds-high-flag-gay-equality/
Would be great if he meant it but all the talk/his siding with making Gay Marriage a state issue (again, which will likely go back to what 12? 14? states with Gay Marriage on the books) + basically allowing discrimination of LGBT on the grounds of 'religious' or 'moral' freedom basically spits in the face of championing gay equality and paints it as nothing more than lip service.
Harley Quinn said:BigD said:http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/2/donald-trump-holds-high-flag-gay-equality/
Would be great if he meant it but all the talk/his siding with making Gay Marriage a state issue (again, which will likely go back to what 12? 14? states with Gay Marriage on the books) + basically allowing discrimination of LGBT on the grounds of 'religious' or 'moral' freedom basically spits in the face of championing gay equality and paints it as nothing more than lip service.
Damaramu said:Harley Quinn said:BigD said:http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/2/donald-trump-holds-high-flag-gay-equality/
Would be great if he meant it but all the talk/his siding with making Gay Marriage a state issue (again, which will likely go back to what 12? 14? states with Gay Marriage on the books) + basically allowing discrimination of LGBT on the grounds of 'religious' or 'moral' freedom basically spits in the face of championing gay equality and paints it as nothing more than lip service.
I'm hoping that because the supreme court ruled on it that it's going to be very very hard to repeal.
I hate that "the states should decide it" thing. For god's sake if the states are going to prove they can't do the right thing then I'm all for us making them do the right thing.